YDS Okuma Paragrafı · Metinden çıkarım ve kanıt Soruları

Soru 1

What concern led the curator to reject the assistant's suggestion?

1. A Visitors might find the database easier to search than the paper catalogue.
2. B Researchers might notice that the original descriptions used old terminology.
3. C Staff might spend less time copying entries into the new database.
4. D Readers might mistake a likely explanation for a documented fact.
5. E The museum might retain descriptions that were already supported by evidence.

Soru 2

Why was new evidence placed in a separate field?

1. A To prevent later researchers from questioning the original descriptions.
2. B To make every object description contain exactly the same amount of text.
3. C To ensure that uncertain statements were excluded from all future searches.
4. D To replace the original wording whenever a more attractive account appeared.
5. E To distinguish later additions from the original catalogue statements.

Soru 3

Which statement best describes the museum's approach to completeness?

1. A An openly incomplete record can be preferable to a complete-looking one that hides uncertainty.
2. B A complete-looking description is acceptable when its explanation appears sufficiently plausible.
3. C Any uncertain description should be removed even when the original wording can be preserved.
4. D A digital catalogue should be considered final once all paper entries have been copied.
5. E The main purpose of a catalogue is to give every entry an equally polished appearance.

Soru 4

The final sentence suggests that revisions should preserve a record of ----.

1. A how many visitors preferred the digital catalogue
2. B how often the museum redesigned its public website
3. C which staff member copied each entry the fastest
4. D which objects should be removed from the collection
5. E how and on what basis the descriptions have changed

Soru 5

Why had the experienced reviewers overlooked the missing direction?

1. A They had been instructed to check spelling while ignoring all practical procedures.
2. B They had unconsciously used their own knowledge to fill in what the text omitted.
3. C They had reviewed a completely different version of the manual from the new users.
4. D They had deliberately removed the location of the setting to shorten the manual.
5. E They had never used the software and therefore could not recognise the task.

Soru 6

What did observing first-time users reveal?

1. A A requirement that every task be explained entirely through pictures instead of words.
2. B A disagreement about whether the software should be offered to experienced employees.
3. C A gap between understanding the written wording and being able to complete the task.
4. D A reason to remove all references to settings from future versions of the manual.
5. E A finding that assistance always makes instruction manuals impossible to evaluate.

Soru 7

Why were different first-time users involved after the revision?

1. A Their familiarity with the original missing direction would make all later results comparable.
2. B Their greater knowledge of the system would remove the need to observe any actual use.
3. C Their participation would prove that the revised manual contained no remaining difficulties.
4. D Their attempt could show whether the added direction helped people without prior task experience.
5. E Their task was to decide which experienced reviewer should have noticed the omission.

Soru 8

Which conclusion is best supported by the passage?

1. A Experienced reviewers are unable to make useful contributions to written instructions.
2. B A manual should be published as soon as its reviewers agree that the wording is clear.
3. C One successful revision demonstrates that every section of a manual is ready for use.
4. D New users generally perform better when a manual leaves familiar steps unexplained.
5. E Expert review and observation of newcomers can provide complementary evidence about instructions.

Soru 9

Why did some committee members question the initial interpretation of attendance?

1. A The attendance figures had been calculated for a different library in the same town.
2. B The website had announced that evening visitors would need to pay an additional fee.
3. C The announcement may not have reached residents who were unable to use the normal hours.
4. D The trial had attracted more visitors than the building could safely accommodate.
5. E The usual opening hours had been cancelled for the entire duration of the trial.

Soru 10

What would the proposed questions to non-users help the committee investigate?

1. A Whether every resident preferred an online service to visiting the building.
2. B Whether the library could guarantee attendance before offering a new service.
3. C Whether existing visitors should be prevented from using the evening hours.
4. D Whether limited awareness could partly explain the low evening attendance.
5. E Whether attendance records should be discarded whenever a trial is unsuccessful.

Soru 11

Which distinction is central to the passage?

1. A The distinction between borrowing a book and returning it after the due date.
2. B The distinction between permanent library employees and temporary volunteers.
3. C The distinction between the cost of a website and the cost of printing books.
4. D The distinction between collecting attendance data and counting available chairs.
5. E The distinction between not wanting an opportunity and not knowing it exists.

Soru 12

How did the committee treat the attendance figures?

1. A It retained them while seeking more information before drawing a wider conclusion.
2. B It replaced them with estimates from residents who had not visited the library.
3. C It rejected them as false because they did not match its original expectations.
4. D It accepted them as sufficient proof that later opening could never be useful.
5. E It withheld them until the trial produced the increase members had predicted.